in any case
US /ɪn ˈɛni kes/
・UK /in ˈeni keis/
A1 初級
phr.片語無論如何
In any case, I'm not going.
影片字幕
Fantastic Four：驚奇4超人集結前，你該知道的10件事！ (10 Things To Remember Before The Fantastic Four: First Steps)
- In any case, Galactus should play a key role in sending the Fantastic Four to Earth 616.
無論如何，在把神奇四俠送往地球 616 的過程中，"銀河戰士 "應該扮演一個關鍵角色。
- In any case, Galactus should play a key role in sending the Fantastic Four to Earth 616.
銀色衝浪者的崛起》，《沙拉巴爾》。
「我不會被你霸凌！」 Pam Bondi 與民主黨參議員 Schiff 和 Padilla 激烈交鋒！ ('I’m not going to be bullied by you': Pam Bondi clashes with Dem Senators Schiff and Padilla)
- I will look at the facts and evidence in any case.
在任何情況下，我都會看事實和證據。
- I will look at the facts and evidence in any case.
現在加州的犯罪率已經突破了屋頂。
第五週 (Week 5)
- But in any case, in this example, the story is much simpler.
如果我要在加布型 再一次，第二次，
- But in any case, in this example, the story is much simpler.
那麼，presumably--
阿甘正傳的隱藏意義？阿甘的人生哲理你懂了嗎？😱 (Hidden Meaning in Forrest Gump – Earthling Cinema)
- anything. In any case, as the great
任何事情。在任何情況下，作為偉大的
- In any case, as the great philosopher Forrest Gump's mom says, life is like a box of chocolates.
任何事情。在任何情況下，作為偉大的
在日本環球影城吃遍所有美食 (Eating Everything at Universal Studios JAPAN)
- But in any case, I'm going to stuff my face.
Aki 也還沒吃早餐對吧？
洛克、貝克萊與經驗論：Crash Course 哲學 #6 (Locke, Berkeley, & Empiricism: Crash Course Philosophy #6)
- But in any case, the second your friend blinks, you're gone.
覺知我，我就停止存在了！
- But in any case, the second your friend blinks, you’re gone!
但是不論如何，只要你的朋友一扎眼，你就消失了！
馬斯克揭露狗狗幣最驚人的發現 — AI 才是解決債務危機的關鍵？！🐕💰 (Elon Musk Details DOGE’s Most Shocking Discoveries — and Why AI Is Key to Solving the Debt Crisis)
- In any case, as a special government employee, I could only Be there for like 120 days anyway, something like that.
總之，身為一名特別政府僱員，我最多隻能待 120 天左右，之類的。
- So then I'm like, "The best thing for me is to just cut out of this." And in any case, as a special government employee, I could only be there for 120 days anyway, something like that, or whatever the law says.
所以身為特別政府僱員，我最多隻能待四個月。
不可能的任務時間線大揭密！ (The Mission Impossible Timeline Explained)
- In any case, Marie's death at the hands of a terrorist known as Gabriel forever changed Ethan's life.
無論如何，瑪麗死於一個名叫加布裡埃爾的恐怖分子之手，這永遠地改變了伊森的生活。
- In any case, Marie's death at the hands of a terrorist known as Gabriel forever changed Ethan's life.
結果，菲爾普斯偽造了自己的死亡，密謀將 IMF 的資訊賣給軍火商。
受傷的人如何尋求更進一步的懲罰？ (How Wounded People Seek Out further Punishment)
- It's just that for us, home was a place of grief and persecution. It's easy enough to see why children put up with poor treatment. They're born radically powerless. They can't run away. They are utterly at the mercy of others. They can't even think especially straight. What they must do, above all else, is adapt. Which in practice means learning to put up with poor treatment. They have to develop an advanced skill at not noticing quite how awful things are, an expertise at being unfazed by cruelty and neglect. Children in deprived circumstances tend to be geniuses at looking away, disassociating and making light of things. Of course, it might not be perfect that their father screams at them constantly, but there are some interesting shows on television and there's a really fascinating bit of the garden to explore in the morning. You can climb up the big tree and imagine it's a little house. And of course, ideally their mother wouldn't be so mocking and disloyal. But that's just the way things are, neither more or less sad than the fact it's often raining and there's a lot of homework to do. In any case, the bad treatment almost certainly has to do with something that they, the child, have done wrong. Badly treated children tend to take a compulsively generous view of those who injure them. Obviously, they aren't nasty on purpose. That would make no sense. Clearly, their ostensible brutality has sound explanations. It must be because they, the child, is in the wrong. That's why they're being neglected. That's why they've been declared fools. That's why they're being bullied. It's a great deal easier to believe that the parent is tough, yet fundamentally right, rather than gratuitously callous and unjustifiably hostile. In other words, what a bad childhood trains us to do, above all else, is to indulge meanness. The muscle that normally functions to repel attacks has had to be starved and has atrophied. In order to survive, we had to lose the ability to work out what was good and bad for us, lest we discover that we spent 18 years in the company of fiends. What this means for our futures is that we will be extremely poor at discerning when the partners we let into our lives cross the border into selfishness and malevolence. We'll continue under a narcoleptic command not to notice that we're being robbed and deceived. We'll be as blind to the blows now as we were then. For a long time, it simply won't occur to us to wonder why we've ended up paying for everything for the partner, or why they're unreliable in their promises, or constantly prioritise their friends over us, or are angrily defensive whenever we raise a complaint. We will simply, as we had to early on, fall into line and invent elaborate explanations for their behaviour. They're good, but they're tired. They're durable, but under pressure at work. They're fierce, but compensating for their childhood traumas, for which we have a lot of sympathy. Anything other than the more straightforward conclusion, we've fallen in with unconcerned egoists. We shouldn't compound our disloyalty towards ourselves by feeling, on top of everything else, ashamed for our tolerance. It isn't weakness, it's a survival strategy from childhood that served a very sensible purpose then but is liable to be ruining our lives now. To wake ourselves up, we need to consider our choices as if someone else had made them. We might wonder what we would advise a friend to do if they were in our situation. And through such a lens, we might start to perceive that the treatment we're facing isn't, as we've long thought, a sign of our partner's depth or complexity, but in the end, something much more humble, evidence that we need to get away. But this will be only a momentary liberation until we can understand the more fundamental issue, that the muscle most people use to eject poison has withered because of a distinctive history. We need to reverse the direction of our psychological fate. Our early suffering should not condemn us to yet more pain. It is what gives us an especially powerful claim on original sources of kindness, tenderness and calm.
只是對我們來說，家是一個充滿悲傷和迫害的地方。很容易理解為什麼孩子們要忍受惡劣的待遇。他們生來就毫無力量他們無法逃避。他們完全任由他人擺佈。他們甚至連思考的能力都沒有他們必須做的，最重要的，就是適應。在實踐中，這意味著要學會忍受惡劣的待遇。他們必須發展出一種高級技能，即不去注意事情有多糟糕，擅長對殘忍和忽視不為所動。生活在貧困環境中的孩子往往是睜一隻眼閉一隻眼、脫離現實和輕描淡寫的天才。當然，他們的父親經常對他們大吼大叫，這可能並不完美，但電視上有一些有趣的節目，而且早上可以去花園裡探索一個非常迷人的地方
- In any case, the bad treatment almost certainly has to do with something that they—the child—have done wrong.
失戀到瘋狂？給那些為前任失去理智的人的野性建議！ (Wild Advice for Those Who Have Lost Their Minds Over an Ex)
- Firstly, don't expect to get over this any time soon. Severe damage is done by those who – out of great kindness – frame heartbreak as something that we must all inevitably get over with time. But what if there were no shoulds in this area? What if we let the pain last just as long and not a minute less as it needs to, which might be three months, ten years or the rest of one's life, but in any case considerably longer than one's sensible married friends seem to think it should last? What if we recategorised this as a chronic illness rather than a passing cold? What if we didn't compound our sorrows by setting bounds to them and then castigating ourselves for trespassing them? What if we assumed very darkly that we would just never quite get over this?
首先，不要指望很快就能克服這個問題。有些人出於好心，把心碎說成是隨著時間的推移我們必然會克服的事情，這對我們造成了嚴重的傷害。但如果在這方面沒有 "應該 "呢？也許是三個月，也許是十年，也許是人的餘生，但無論如何，都要比明智的已婚朋友們所認為的持續時間要長得多。如果我們把它重新歸類為慢性病而不是一時的感冒呢？如果我們不給自己的悲傷設定界限，然後又責備自己踐踏了這些界限，讓悲傷變得更加複雜呢？如果我們暗自假設我們永遠都無法克服這個問題呢？
- but in any case considerably longer than one's sensible married friends seem to think it should last.